In November 2012, Beijing launched a pilot furniture trade-in campaign led by the Municipal Commission of Commerce. The initiative was successful, and the program was reintroduced on July 1st of this year with an expanded scope and more refined procedures. As December approaches, the event is nearing its conclusion, but some consumers have reported not yet receiving their 10% furniture subsidy. Is this an isolated issue or a widespread problem?
The "trade-in" campaign has proven to be highly effective in boosting consumer interest in purchasing new furniture. This year, brand sales increased by 30%, largely due to the success of the trade-in initiative. Although some individuals have experienced delays in receiving their subsidies—often due to incomplete information—overall, the program has been beneficial for both consumers and merchants. As long as the process is well-managed, challenges should not hinder its success.
"Trading in for the new" has significantly boosted sales performance. Since the policy was implemented on July 1st, furniture sales in the city have seen consistent growth. In October alone, trade-in furniture sales rose by 70% compared to September.
According to data released by the Beijing Municipal Commission of Commerce in November, furniture trade-in sales hit a record high in October. Eleven furniture retailers sold 45,956 units through the trade-in program, generating 320 million yuan in sales. This accounted for 37% of total furniture sales. Sales of four types of furniture increased by 11% year-on-year, while overall furniture sales rose by 6%.
However, the report did not include specific details about how many consumers received the 10% subsidy. This lack of transparency has raised questions among participants.
It appears that most consumers who qualify for the subsidy do eventually receive it. Wang Ningning, deputy manager of the Actual Home Group, stated that the company aims to provide subsidies to all eligible customers. By the end of November, they had received 35,000 trade-in applications, with 17,000 subsidies already issued—about 48.6% of all applications. Those who haven't received their subsidy are typically waiting for the new furniture to be delivered and the old items to be collected.
Ding Ping, from Jimei Home Furnishing, noted that some customers found the process cumbersome, and others were delayed in receiving their subsidies. She explained that incomplete customer information often slowed down the process. To address this, Jimei is considering establishing a dedicated trade-in department to streamline the procedure.
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain why some consumers haven’t received their subsidies on time.
**Hypothesis 1: Sales companies didn’t pay in advance?**
According to the policy, the 10% subsidy must be paid in advance by the sales companies. Some businesses initially hesitated due to concerns about fake orders, which created financial pressure. However, most companies now follow the "advance subsidy" principle. For example, Top 100 Furniture stated that while there is some pressure, the risk of fraud is low since they only sell their own products.
**Hypothesis 2: The process is too complicated?**
This year’s trade-in process involves three main steps: application, hand-in, and subsidy collection. Consumers need to submit various documents, including contracts, invoices, and ID copies. Some brands have reported delays in processing because of order backlogs or incomplete paperwork.
**Hypothesis 3: Timing issues?**
Each retailer has its own timeline for processing subsidies. The timing of when customers place orders, when old furniture is returned, and when merchants submit claims can all affect the speed of the subsidy distribution.
**Hypothesis 4: No third-party oversight?**
Currently, there is no strict regulation or penalty for late payments. Unlike appliance trade-ins, furniture trade-ins involve more complex processes due to product specificity and incomplete customer data. Some consumers have called for stricter guidelines on subsidy timelines.
Overall, while the program has been successful, some challenges remain. With better coordination and clearer communication, the trade-in initiative could become even more efficient and rewarding for everyone involved.
Small End Suction Pump,case centrifugal pump,double suction pump
Sichuan Zigong Industrial Pump Co.,Ltd. , https://www.zgpump-global.com